HKW

Saturday, May 31, 2008

‘The End of Poverty'




After reading this great book written by Jeffrey Sachs, a renowned Harvard professor in economics, I have realized how little the rich countries spent on eradicating world poverty in the past and how much they should do to avert the third world plight in the future. Leaders of the rich nations should feel disgraced of their meanness on resources allocated for poverty relief. Midget spending on helping the poor is further dwarfed by enormous military expenses. The United States, an affluent superpower, has her military spending thirty times the sum of all major nations in the globe. After the 911 attack, the Bush administrations have opened the green light for the huge military spending in the name of anti-terrorism. They mislead the general public to believe that only the invincible military power and the preemptive strike of the potential hostile nations are the keys to maintaining world peace.

In fact, it is poverty that seeds social unrest and terrorism. Channeling a minute proportion of military expenses on poverty relief can narrow the rich gap and to a certain extent, resolve the conflict between the rich and poor, one of the underlying causes of terrorism. Over-spending on military obviously eats up resources that could be apportioned for poverty relief. Misconceptions on causes on poverty as promulgated by politicians have damped down the passion of rich nations for shouldering more responsibility of alleviating world poverty. Their general belief is that poor governance in authoritarian regimes, lack of democracy and impoverished human capital are to blame for poverty of a nation. Their claims, not supported by sound evidence, are good excuses for well-off nations to scrap resources on poverty relief.

The author mentions in his book that causes of poverty are quite unique in different nations and cannot be simply generalized into poor governance and over-intervention of the free market as claimed by politicians from affluent nations. There is solid evidence supporting that both biological and geographical factors are the main culprits of poverty. For instance, trading activities of a nation located in the mountain area with poor infrastructure are doomed to fail and this will inevitably hamper the economic development. Similarly, you can’t expect a nation with a majority of her population inflicted by malaria and AIDS to have robust productivity. Poor soil quality and lack of access to modern technology by farmers severely limit food production. Being deprived of the ability of self-reliance in food production, they have to resort to expensive imported food. Without surplus produce for trading, they will soon be pushed to the vicious cycle of the poverty trap.

It is disappointed to learn that IMF and World Bank only stick to the policy of axing public spending and urging prompt debt payment by Third world nations as the elixir of poverty relief. These organizations dominated by the West do more harm than good to the livelihood of people in the Third world by sticking to these doctrines. In order to foot the debt, poor nations have to cut expenses essential for eradicating infectious diseases. If the affluent nations wrote off their debts and gave them support pinning down the key causes of poverty, poor nations would have the chance of escaping from the poverty trap so that the people could have their own asset, a booster of local investment essential for the sustainable economic development of a nation.

The recent rocketing rise in food price has pushed hundreds of millions of poor to the blink of riots. To help them boost food production, they should be given the opportunity to gain access to modified seeds, chemical fertilizers, organic fertilizers and small scale irrigation systems, which are the crux to solving food production problem. Transforming the above ideas into reality requires the generous support from the intergovernmental organizations and government of affluent nations.

To solve world poverty, creative mindsets and concerted efforts from IMF, World Bank and Western nations are needed to deliver magic bullets aiming at the critical problems encountered in those countries in plight and saving them from the poverty trap forever.

Monday, May 19, 2008

四川地震賑災義賣

Multiplex Bingo (2.5m)




Fox (2m)

義賣網站:








Sunday, May 18, 2008

Let the soft power of our country grow strong

The devastation caused by the 8.2 scale earthquake in Sichuan has claimed tens of thousands of lives and ruined countless families. Chinese government has allowed the foreign media to report on the calamity and this was unperceivable in the past. CCTV has kept on updating the information on the disaster. The government even arranged a news conference to answer the queries raised by media. All these unprecedented acts have been well praised and won support from western leaders. Compared with the xenophobic responses of the Myanmar government to foreign aids, the openness and swift response of the Chinese government to the quake disaster have been widely recognized and acknowledged by people all over the world.

Premier Wen JiaPao’s firm support to the rescue team at the scene and his heart-felt empathy sent to victims have made him a spiritual leader of the rescue operation. His performance in risk management is more than comparable to what the ex-mayor did after the 911 attack in New York.

Through the media, the bravery acts of soldiers and civilians to pull victims from rubble without paying much attention to their own safety have been broadcast worldwide. Hundreds of millions of people around the globe were moved by these scenes and they together with myriad NGOs pour huge aids to relief the plight of people in Sichuan. Netizens and NGOs in China have self-organized to do what they can to help the rescue operation.

All the above mentioned features are signs of a maturing civic society. Government’s swift responses to disaster, free information flow and strong mobilizing power of self-organized civilian groups demonstrate a substantial rise in the ’soft power’ of our country. We hope ‘the soft power’of our country will grow strong, perpetuate and push the peaceful development of our country to a new level.

Saturday, May 17, 2008

讓國家的軟實力壯大起來吧!

四川的7.8級大地震,造成超過三萬人傷亡,災情嚴峻。可幸的是中國政府一反過往對資訊封鎖的慣常做法,破天荒容許境外媒體進入災場採訪。中央電視台不停報導災情的最新發展,政府有關部門更鮮有地安排新聞發佈會,向中外媒體交代救災進展,這一切舉動使西方國家對中國政府的表現刮目相看。

和緬甸軍政府在風災後消極和排外的態度相比,中國政府的開放態度在國際間贏得不少掌聲。國家總理溫家寶第一時間趕赴災場為救援隊打氣,為傷者送上關懷,成為抗災的精神領袖,其危機管理的手法比前紐約市長朱迪亞尼在911後的表現有過之而無不及。

透過傳媒,我們見到中國軍民上下一心,不顧自身安危,在險境中搶救傷者,高尚的情操令人動容。民眾透過互聯網,自發組織起來,一個一個民間組織紛紛成立,運用自己的專長幫助救災,這一切都反映中國的公民社會已漸趨成熟。

中國政府災後的快速反應、對資訊流通採取開放的態度和民間組織強大的動員力量,都在在反映國家軟實力的提升。如果硬實力(泛指經濟力量)是支持國家發展的樁柱,哪麼軟實力(泛指人民素質、政府的管治能力和透明度)就是穩住這樁柱的基石。

希望國家的軟實力在災難後如火鳳凰般重生,不斷壯大,並且延績下去,為國家的和平崛起開展新的一頁。